
Mary Ann BAILEY

-
Name Mary Ann BAILEY Birth Abt 1803 Rochester, Kent [1]
Gender Female 1841 Census At 1841 Census, she is "44" 1851 Census 5, Chiswell St., Camberwell, Surrey [1]
At 1851 Census, she is 48, occ "Ropemaker empl 20" Individual Reference Possibly born about 1797 [2] Individual Note 4 she was 54 when she died [3] Death Abt 1857 Camberwell, Surrey [3]
Burial 29 Mar 1857 St. Matthias, Upper Tulse Hill, Brixton, Surrey [3]
Person ID I582 Webb Last Modified 1 Jun 2025
Family James DISBOROUGH, b. 16 Aug 1791 d. Abt 1843, Mitcham, Surrey (Age 51 years)
Marriage 23 Aug 1817 St. Pancras Old Church, Pancras Road, Camden, Middlesex [4]
Marriage Fact Note - marriage details are dependent on finding children born nearby and soon after... Children 1. Frances Elizabeth DESBOROUGH, b. Abt 1825, Greenwich, Kent [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
2. James DESBOROUGH, b. Abt 1828, Greenwich, Kent [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
3. Mary Ann DESBOROUGH, b. Abt 1830, Gillingham, Kent [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
4. Louis James DESBOROUGH, b. Abt 1832, Stratford, Essex [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
5. Edward Joseph DESBOROUGH, b. Abt 1833, Mitcham, Surrey d. 1900, Southwark, Surrey
(Age 67 years) [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
6. Arthur DESBOROUGH, b. Abt 1834, Middlesex [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
7. Louisa DESBOROUGH, b. Abt 1836, Mitcham, Surrey [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
8. Henry DESBOROUGH, b. Abt 1837, Surrey [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
9. John Edwin DESBOROUGH, b. 12 Jan 1839, Locks Lane, Mitcham, Surrey d. 1855, Chiswell St., Camberwell, Surrey
(Age 15 years) [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
10. Edward DESBOROUGH, b. Abt 1843, Mitcham, Surrey [Father: natural] [Mother: natural]
Family ID F183 Group Sheet | Family Chart Last Modified 1 Jun 2025
-
Event Map = Link to Google Earth
-
Notes - a tree with 2 spouses is at http://trees.ancestry.co.uk/tree/9137987/person/74515995
possible baptisms (both in Chatham) are 8/4/1796 and 8/6/1800, but nothing to say which (if either) are correct
- a tree with 2 spouses is at http://trees.ancestry.co.uk/tree/9137987/person/74515995
-
Sources