| Name |
Charles Henry IMPEY |
| Birth |
28 Mar 1898 |
13, Hemans St., Lambeth, Surrey  [1, 2] |
| Baptism |
15 Apr 1898 |
All Saints, Lower Marsh, Vauxhall, Surrey [3] |
| Gender |
Male |
| 1901 Census |
13, Hemans St., Lambeth, Surrey [4] |
| At 1901 Census, he is 3 |
| 1911 Census |
13, Hemans Street, Lambeth, Surrey [1] |
| At 1911 Census, he is 13 |
| Individual Note |
best match on death is Oct qtr 1916, Lambeth vol 1d, p456, aged 16 |
| Person ID |
I441 |
Webb |
| Last Modified |
7 Mar 2025 |
| Father |
Charles Henry IMPEY, b. 1860, Battersea, Middlesex |
| Relationship |
natural |
| Mother |
Emma Laughton WELTON, b. 17 Dec 1862, Regency Square, Lambeth |
| Relationship |
natural |
| Marriage |
4 Aug 1884 |
St. Barnabas, Kennington [5] |
| Family Fact |
At 1911 Census, there are 5 children total of whom 2 died [1] |
| Marriage Fact |
both were living at 37, Neptune St when they were married [5] |
| Notes |
- In addition to Emma, there is another child who had died at the 1911 Census. There does not appear to be any obvious records in BMD or London baptisms.
Restricting the birth and death to Lambeth give
Dora Gladys b1904
Benjamin Joseph (given as HAMP) b1905
Alternatively looking at birth registrations with a mother maiden name of WELTON, with soundex switched on, anywhere in the country does not identify another child. I believe that the mother maiden name is unreliable before 1911, though it clearly picks up the other 4 children, so this might be a reason. It might be a mistake, but this seems unlikely. It might have been a stillborn, and not registered, but still something of importance to the parents of course.
|
| Family ID |
F192 |
Group Sheet | Family Chart |
1898 -
