Notes
Matches 951 to 1,000 of 1,012
| # | Notes | Linked to |
|---|---|---|
| 951 | There is no very obvious information after her baptism. There is a Joane Jackman "of Spreyton" buried S Tawton 4/12/1741, but whilst Spreyton is not far away, the youngest brother, Alexander, was baptised at S Tawton in April 1739. There is a Joan Jackman buried S Tawton 30/12/1770 which is possible. There is a Joan Jackman who married John SAMPSON 5/11/1787 (ie aged 42), witnessed by Thomas Jackman, ie possibly her brother. This seems equally possible. | JACKMAN, Joane (I746)
|
| 952 | There is no very obvious later records for William, but the name is a very common one, and there are both possible deaths before 1851 and possible 1851 and 1861 census records. | HALL, William (I508)
|
| 953 | There is no very obvious records after 1851. My presumption is that he died between 1851 and 1861, and although there is nothing in Crediton, he may have gone to London. There is a Samuel Howe marrying a Mary Ann GRAHAM in Bath, but I think this is a different Samuel, son of John and Emma... | HOWE, Samuel (I901)
|
| 954 | There is nothing to identify what happens after baptism... There is a marriage to George WANNACOTE in Sept 1749 (see also Marian Jackman bapt 1692) - which would be possible if this Marian were baptised as a child, but there is nothing to indicate that. There are no obvious other marriages or deaths within 20 miles of South Tawton, though there are instances of Mary Jackman being buried, so it could be one of these, but there are Mary Jackmans in this family in South Tawton who also occupy these records!!! | JACKMAN, Marian (I728)
|
| 955 | There is reference to a bankruptcy against a business partner of James, William Henry FRENCH. I cannot be sure that it is this James Disborough but the address suggests that it is. It would seem that the partners, described as "Provision Brokers and Dealers" in Little Eastcheap, became bankrupt on 11/9/1816, with the final determination being made on 3/2/1824. My knowledge of what happens is poor, but I sense that James and Henry parted ways following the bankruptcy notice; maybe this allowed James to marry in 1817? | DISBOROUGH, James (I229)
|
| 956 | There is very little about Mary that I can find, but the marriage looks right. Both Peter and Mary are recorded as widowed, and so Mary's surname at the time (CROW) is not her birth name. But I can find no suitable burial for Mary Juniper. So the story is definitely incomplete. Conversely, the document "Some Rough Materials for a History of the Hundred of North Erpingham, Vol. 1, 1883 - Compilation of Published Sources" says her name is Sarah. This says burial 27 Sep 1813, aged 54 at death, but the handwritten burial register which is slightly different, is assumed to be correct. However, there is no record of Sarah marrying a CROW that really matches any other data. So we assume her name is Mary, but for whatever reason she is Sarah after marrying Peter. Perhaps this is related to the daughter who died not long before the wedding? To understand Mary's past, I have looked at possible men surnamed CROW (or CROWE) who were buried in the 20 years leading up to her wedding with Peter, and within 5 miles of Mundesley. Only John CROW is a possibility. I cannot find the original document but the transcripts have him being buried either 1/12/1797 or 1/12/1798. Hopefully it is the first of these to allow the banns to be read for the marriage to Peter. I then looked at marriages between a male CROW/CROWE and Mary or Sarah, within 10 miles of Mundesley. There is a Charles CROW marrying Mary STEWARD on 26/8/1782 at North Walsham. However Charles does not appear to have died before 1798. So I think the most likely scenario is John CROW marrying Mary PALGRAVE 12/4/1771 at North Walsham. The issue with the suggested marriage is that, Mary would be 13 at her marriage. However, I think it more likely that she was unsure about her age than one of the other possibilities above. There are lots of possible baptisms for John Crow; maybe the most probable is a baptism in 1744 at North Walsham. There is nothing obvious for Mary Palgrave (or indeed Mary Steward), but a number of possiblities at 20 miles distant. The only other option is with records not yet available on the Internet. So this is still a best guess!!!! | PALGRAVE, Mary (I946)
|
| 957 | There is very little obvious about Richard's origins. The transcript of the baptism only mentions his mother Jane, who was presumably unmarried. See also some notes on Jane (some of which are identical to those here) Whilst Jane is assumed to be KNOWLES, it is noted that there are no obvious baptisms for a 20 year period either side of 1757 for a KNOWLES with a mother called Jane. So it is possible that Richard's mother just invented a surname. In that case Richard may have grown up with any surname. possible death 1809 based on IGI information There is a Richard KNOWLES who was buried at Cruwys Morchard 18/3/1796. But this is 13-14 miles away from Bow. The significance is that it appears to be the only person of this name, or something similar with practical burial details. However there are clearly a number of KNOWLES and KNOWLS baptised and buried here, so it is also quite unlikely to be our Richard. | KNOWLES, Richard (I677)
|
| 958 | There may be some inaccuracies and there is a risk that I am picking up 2 different people, one born in Cripplegate (see for instance 1901, 1911 and 1921 Census), and one born in Gravesend (see for instance 1891 Census). But there are other consistent facts, eg the Juniper connection (dont actually know yet who is George W JUNIPER in the 1901 Census, but it would be entirely reasonable for him to lodge with a family member, who might be a cousin of Elizabeth for instance). More work on this is needed. See also the notes about the separation or not with his wife in the notes for Elizabeth | LITTLEMORE, James William (I1004)
|
| 959 | There were 2 Poor Houses in Portsmouth at the time, but it is assumed to be the one in Elm Lane, Portsea, given the burial location. | HILLBECK, Edward (I1131)
|
| 960 | There were 2 properties with rent (presumably not owned) in Lower Precinct, St Leonards, Cheapside with a James DISBOROUGH - this may be him and his father or both him(?). This applies from 1808 to 1813, at which point Frances takes over, hence the assumed death date. There is also rent in Lower Precint, St Leonards in 1798. There is a James DISBOROUGH, perfumer, at 7, Fish St. Hill in the Holden Directory of 1799 and 1802, but nothing for the 1805 and 1809 editions for James DISBOROUGH or DESBOROUGH, or similar names. Ancestry has trees with his parents as William and Frances, but ith no independent evidence for this. Index to death duties for Apr 1813 mentions Frances DISBOROUGH, 7, Fish St. Hill | DISBOROUGH, James (I239)
|
| 961 | They had 6 children, based on 1911 Census, all listed at 1901 viz:- Clara, 16 Charlotte, 15 Ellen, 13 Florence, 8 Jane, 5 William, 2 | Family: William James WEBB / Jane MARSHALL (F177)
|
| 962 | This comes next to the entry for the Rectory, so presumably was the house nearest to it. | Source (S478)
|
| 963 | This deduced on the basis that it seems most likely marriage to Sophia - in which case it is Apr qtr 1852, Bury St Edmonds | Family: John JARRELL / Sophia MOTHERSOLE (F235)
|
| 964 | This information has been largely deduced from Ann's second marriage - which is highly likely to be correct given the fathers details. The only thing that does not really match is John Hover b 1836 who is therefore presumably Susan Amelia's twin but has not been found yet in the Bertand details.... Ann married John R HOVER (1809-1868) on 4/10/1836 in Islington. Birth/baptism details fit in part and are best available info on the internet but suggests that Ann's father moved very quickly from labourer here to victualler at her 2nd wedding..... | ELDRIDGE, Ann (I91)
|
| 965 | This is clearly a local name, but there is no sensible record on the internet that matches this. | SCKOYLS, Jane (I975)
|
| 966 | This is clearly the right baptism details, and so it is surprising that at the Census she was said to be not born in county. However William who was born in county according to the Census is not obvious in Herts parish records, so perhaps he was not..... She almost certainly marries, but there is no clear basis for any particular marriage, though internet trees favour Thomas DEAN (Q4, 1844). | FREEMAN, Sarah (I195)
|
| 967 | This marriage has been picked as most sensible based on ages etc. There is an Agnes BATTIISHILL, his cousin who could be his wife, but the age difference is greater, and marrying cousins was of course frowned on (or worse), so the Agnes picked here seems more likely. There is also a marriage in South Tawton between John Jackman and Susannah TRIMLETT in 1737, which is taken to be that of John Jackman, his nephew, b1716. Allocating children is more complicated since the vicar did not put down the names of the mother - but it is assumed that the earlier children are those of this John. Certainly there is a Susanna Jackman in 1743 which is most likely to the nephew. Similarly there is a John in 1745, but there is no evidence that John, the son of this John, b1731, had died, so the later John is assumed to be linked to John and Susannah. There is a lot of suggestion on the internet trees that this John married again (though clearly a marriage to Anne Splatt is wrong), but again this is not supported by the available evidence of the only sensible Agnes dieing in 1774. Lastly there is a marriage in Spreyton with a John Jackman to Mary MIDDLETON on 21/4/1755, but that is for people living in that parish, and although close, is assumed to be a different John. | JACKMAN, John (I744)
|
| 968 | This marriage is the only sensible William Dell marrying a Mary in Devon on IGI. This matches the transcriptions from the Devon FHS. There is another marriage at Burrington, towards Barnstable, in 1795, but there is no reason to assume this is more likely. It leaves a gap on IGI between this and the firstborn in 1782. Some sites have the marriage year transcribed as 1792. I have picked 1781 as although the Bishops transcripts are just that, they are contemporaneous. IGI has the year of marriage transcribed as 1782. Note - although the bishops transcription of the marriage says William came from Clannaborough and Mary from Bow, the transcript for their son Richard says "son of Wm and Mary Delve of Clannaborough" | Family: William DELL / Mary HEARD (F266)
|
| 969 | This marriage record appears to be the most sensible.... I can find no record of suitable baptisms before Mary in 1731, in Owermoigne or any nearby village or town. So there is a gap between the marriage and the first child, but perhaps not unreasonable either. The marriage record says they were both from Owermoigne, so I am not sure why they were married in Dorchester, and it is possible that one or both of them had worked there or that Joanna was pregnant (but no baptism record to say this) | Family: John GUY / Joanna SANSOM (F400)
|
| 970 | This person is the best match for the name, and whilst it is surprising to move from Yorkshire, Yorks, Lancs and Cheshire is where the Holts appear to come from originally. Aaron's name is HOLT at baptism and burial but HOULT at marriage and when his children are baptised He and Sarah may also have had a child Ann, chr Baldock 8/12/1782 but the gap in time is surprising.... His burial says he was 70 (ie born 1837) but the 1840 record is the only online record that is in any way consistent. National Burial Index says he was buried at St Nicholas, Stevenage | HOLT, Aaron (I468)
|
| 971 | Thomas appears to have been born months after his brother Thomas (1780-1782) died. Baptism transcript says that his parents were William and Eunice (Information on the web says nee BRIDGES) | WOOLSEY, Thomas (I271)
|
| 972 | Thomas Henry WEBB appears to have married Emma SHEPPARD 27/6/1920 (though the father's name not correct). Emma and their 8m old son, Thomas, are with his mother at the 1921 Census. | WEBB, Thomas Henry (I164)
|
| 973 | Thomas probably married Sarah JAMES 30/10/1711 in Zeal (aged 15 but perhaps 16 if he was not baptised immediately after birth). There are no obvious records after this. | BROOKLAND, Thomas (I845)
|
| 974 | Thomas' parents were Charles and Elizabeth There is a Thomas PENNIKET of Silver St., who is admitted to Freedom of City of London as a licensed victualler in March 1835, operating from the Coopers Arms in Golden Lane. It also gives his father as Charles, so it seems likely it is the same person. He appears as the licensee in 1940. So it is possible that this was how he started, and then something went wrong, and became an engraver? Deceasedonline has his burial 3/4/1877, in Camden. | PENNIKET, Thomas (I653)
|
| 975 | TYPE Birth Certificate | Source (S878)
|
| 976 | TYPE Birth Certificate | Source (S794)
|
| 977 | TYPE Birth Certificate | Source (S588)
|
| 978 | TYPE Birth Certificate | Source (S446)
|
| 979 | TYPE Birth Certificate | Source (S44)
|
| 980 | TYPE Birth Certificate | Source (S42)
|
| 981 | TYPE Birth Certificate | Source (S41)
|
| 982 | TYPE Birth Certificate | Source (S40)
|
| 983 | TYPE CensusPLAC 12 Town Street | Source (S2086)
|
| 984 | TYPE Death Certificate | Source (S1178)
|
| 985 | TYPE Death Certificate | Source (S1080)
|
| 986 | TYPE Death Certificate | Source (S983)
|
| 987 | TYPE Family Bible | Source (S1177)
|
| 988 | TYPE Marriage Cert. | Source (S57)
|
| 989 | TYPE Marriage Cert. | Source (S55)
|
| 990 | TYPE Marriage Certificate | Source (S874)
|
| 991 | TYPE Marriage Certificate | Source (S586)
|
| 992 | TYPE Will | Source (S2384)
|
| 993 | Unclear what happens after this. I cannot find any deaths between 1891 and 1901, cannot find her in a census in 1901 and cannot find a marriage. | BENNETT, Emily (I879)
|
| 994 | Various possible marriages or deaths between 1851 and 1861 but none are conclusive. The most likely is perhaps a death in Jan qtr 1861, Southwark vol 1d, p27. | MONGER, Sarah (I45)
|
| 995 | Virtue's parents given as John and Edith. | VEY, Virtue (I1010)
|
| 996 | Was his birthday 14 Feb (like Edward Joseph Valentine Desborough)? Edwin appears to marry Eleanor HOUSTON (his housekeeper in 1911) in Jan qtr 1915, Pancras. Meanwhile his wife appears in a census at Canterbury for both 1901 and 1911, in 1901 with all 4 children, and in 1911 with her father. So either they had separated or it was just that at different censuses each needed to be with a parent. There is no obvious evidence of Hannah after 1911 in death or marriage indices. | DESBOROUGH, Edwin James Valentine (I548)
|
| 997 | was previously at "Sarah Park", Sticklepath | BENNETT, George (I611)
|
| 998 | When her children are born, she is known as MALKIN, but the burial details suggest that the surname given here. Certainly it is the only possiblity of those available on the internet. Parents are Robert and Ann | MAKINGS, Elizabeth (I266)
|
| 999 | When she was baptised, her father William and the family were living at 2, Ponsoby Rd, Westminster. Marries Louis COOKE abt 1893, probably Jul qtr, Chelsea. He may have died 1929 and she in 1931, both in London | WARWICK, Laura (I890)
|
| 1000 | Whilst I dont have a copy of the marriage record, the fact that the most sensible marriage matches somebody with the right DOB given at the 1939 Register, and she is a beneficiary in her mother's will (though not her sister), means that this is assumed to be correct and included in the data. So she marries Ernest W PURTON (or William E, albeit crossed out to Ernest William, in the 1939 Register), Apr qtr 1932 Lambeth. The 1939 Register has EW Purton born 28/9/1902. Note that she lived next door to her sister in retirement. | WEBB, Gladys May (I116)
|