Notes
Matches 951 to 1,000 of 1,046
| # | Notes | Linked to |
|---|---|---|
| 951 | There is a record of banns between Joseph HULL and Elizabeth KILLARNEY both of same parish, Canford Magna (just to the north of Poole) in Aug 1789, implying that they may have married Sept 1789. This is of course about the same time as their son Joseph would have been born. Alternatively Joseph HILL m Elizabeth PHILLIPS May 1787.... | HULL, Joseph (I1207)
|
| 952 | There is a Thomas TUBBS bapt at Hinton Martell in Aug 1724. However given that this is some distance from his presumed (and more likely) marriage, this has been ignored. Note too that there are TUBBS children born to Thomas and Mary in nearby villages, which have also been ignored on grounds of distance. However it is clearly possible that Thomas was born in Hinton Martell, travelled south and married, then went back north, where George and William were born and then south again for Thomas and later children.... It is not very critical, but the people born in the Witchampton to Horton area are TUBBS, and those in the Hamworthy to Wareham area are TUBB. Note - the burial transcript is actually 2 documents which together give the relevant information, | TUBB, Thomas (I1071)
|
| 953 | There is a William DELL in the records of the 46th Foot soldiers at 2/5/1811 aged 21 from Bow. This seems very likely despite the number of similar names. At the register he is stated as being 5' 7", fresh complexion, round visage, hazel eyes and brown hair, occupation a tailor. | DELVE, William (I615)
|
| 954 | There is a William GORDEN who was buried 25/10/1754 Sampford Courtenay. No age given but it is at least possible that this is the same person. | GORDON, Willm (I793)
|
| 955 | There is also an Ann Delve from Tiverton, and there is a small chance that the records are intertwined. But I think Tiverton appears to be where the other Ann was and this is sufficiently far from Bow not to worry. | DELVE, Ann (I817)
|
| 956 | There is an Alfred William LATHAM who died on 20/9/1958 at 9, Chancel Lane, Pinhoe, Exeter leaving a widow Emma Rose LATHAM. The death index puts him at 52, ie dob about 1906. | LATHAM, Alfred William (I156)
|
| 957 | There is an IGI death record for an Arthur Jackman in Devon in 1796, but no other information with this. More likely is a burial at South Tawton in 1775, but it does not say he is from N Tawton. The date of marriage according to the Devon FHS transcript is 8/12/1757..... | JACKMAN, Arthur (I663)
|
| 958 | There is little clear about who Mary is, and where they married. Superficially the best match given the names is a marriage between William IZZARD and Mary GIBBS 1/10/1747 in Banbury. There is no obvious reason for them being in Banbury unless they wanted to get married in a location that did not know they already had a child. But this is the only event I can find on the internet with the right names. Alternatively, William IZARD and Mary WALKER who marry at Baldock 11/4/1732. This then begs the question about apparently missing children between then and 1746. Assuming the burial information is for the right people, it also means that both were close to if not over 80 when they died, which would be unusual for people in this environment. Mary might be a middle name and the marriage might have been with a Christian name (or vice versa). This means that possibly William IZARD and Grace JAMES 15/12/1749 at Baldock is possible, but this seems less likely than either of the others. One other somewhat intriguing story which appears to be popular on the internet is about Mary IZZARD. Mary was a master ???[unclear] who took on Mary CAMFIELD as an apprentice on 18 Feb 1744/5. It would be fun if Mary Camfield married Wright, but the only marriages I can find are to different people. | Family: Wright IZZARD / Mary ??? (F241)
|
| 959 | There is little that confirms anything about Edith's life. The most likely birth records are Wandsworth Q4 1909 - which has her name as Edith Laura. I suspect she may have died young. | THORPE, Edith (I632)
|
| 960 | There is little that is really definite about Sarah's life. The most likely scenario is that in 1841 she was actually with Henry (and named as DAVENPORT), even though they did not marry till 1842. This gives an approximate age, and is then consistent with the burial given. This then means that there were no more children and although Henry does not say widower in the 1851 Census, there is no obvious other Sarah DAVENPORTs in 1851. This means she was born and baptised in 1820 to John and Ann. There is consistency in names though of course these are all common. John says he is a Warehouseman which sounds better than Labourer on Sarah's wedding certificate. | SHORE, Sarah (I330)
|
| 961 | There is little useful data on Edith. Restricting data to within 5 miles of Owermoigne, there are 2 different burials for an Edith Guy in 1744 in Owermoigne, only 1 of which is practical.... she is described as a widow, and was buried 25 April 1744. If we look at baptisms to John and Edith Guy within 10 miles of Owemoigne, there are only 3 possible children: John, as here, Daniel (1695), Jane (1699). However, there is no sensible marriage with a John Guy (or anything like it), so it is likely that there are too many missing records on the internet. So there is no clear evidence for any particular Edith. | ????, Edith (I1317)
|
| 962 | There is no certainty about what happens to Agnes. Within South Tawton, or 5 miles walk of the centre, there is a burial in 1724 and 1735, and a marriage to John JACKMAN in 1729. There is an added difficulty as another Agnes BATTISHILL was baptised (to Richard and Elizabeth) in 1703. Internet trees favour a marriage in Chagford (6miles on foot) to John STAWTE, but I can see no reason for choosing this option. | BATTISHILL, Agnes (I750)
|
| 963 | There is no clear evidence what happened when Henry Hays Dean died, but I assume Albert went with his mother to live with John Webb. This means that for part of his life he was Albert Webb, but clearly at some point between 1901 and 1916 he was told or discovered his birth surname and does not appear to have had anything much to do with his father after that. There are some connections still to his half sister Elizabeth. Albert Webb (or Dean) served in the Royal Artillery from 1908 to 1920, and married Henrietta May SHARMAN 25/3/16 in Ipswich. | DEAN, Albert Edward (I36)
|
| 964 | There is no clear story after baptism. The only marriage I can find is 19/9/1749 to Robert WONNACOTE, which seems rather late in life, and there is no burial details for Marian Wonnacote. It seems more likely that she married younger, and there are no records available for this. There is a Miriam Jackman buried in 1755, so this is possible, but the writing is clearly Miriam not Marian, so this would require a conscious decision by Marian to be called something else? | JACKMAN, Marian (I729)
|
| 965 | There is no definite further information on John, but most likely is that he was buried in North Tawton 23/6/1746 | BROOKLAND, John (I849)
|
| 966 | There is no Jane Dell at the 1881 Census in Devon | DELVE, Jane (I816)
|
| 967 | There is no name like Edwin Vey born in Westminster in 1876 or thereabouts. Nor is he obvious in the 1881 Census. I wonder if he was born with a different surname and was adopted, but there are too many possibilities..... At his burial, it was said he was "late of Oxton". The "Work House" is not clear, but it might be the workhouse, on Oxton Rd., near Southwell. There was a Wesleyan minister assisting at the burial. | VEY, Edwin (I1065)
|
| 968 | There is no obvious baptism or burial information. Possible burials are 16/9/1770 (Martha DISCOMB), best name match, but in Exeter 9/4/1762 (Mary DISCOMBE), in Crediton 26/8/1784 (Mary DISCOMBE), in Crediton 5/10/1785 (Margarett DISHCOM), in South Tawton. None give any indication of age. | SINSCOTT, Martha (I640)
|
| 969 | There is no obvious Census or death record (or any other record) after 1871. | DESBOROUGH, Albert (I555)
|
| 970 | There is no obvious data after they got married. The writing on the marriage certificate looks to be clearly MARTIN. There is a William and Sarah MARSDEN in the 1901 and 1911 Censuses, but this is not them. William's occupation is interesting, and this allows us to rule out some other possibilities. I cannot find any past data for William either | Family: William MARTIN / Sarah Jane IMPEY (F233)
|
| 971 | There is no obvious details of Elizabeth later than this. She may have not married, or she may have married James HORNER in 1774, Thomas DEARMER 1804, or even John HOWARD 1812 | IMPEY, Elizabeth (I440)
|
| 972 | There is no obvious information on his wife in 1939, Alice, nor can I find anybody with a birth that matches what is in the 1939 Register (also tried changing the year by +/- 1 year). I have found a marriage between Alice and John BRUCE in 1946, and then her death (as LING) in 1973. At the 1939 Register she is married, and since she is given as "unpaid domestic duties", Henry is clearly providing the income. Given that he would be 51, I assume he is more likely to be in hospital than providing some direct war effort. On 4/6/1936, he arrives at Tilbury on "Highland Patriot" from Rio da Janeiro, with Alice Mary Dorothy, and a child, Henry, presumably his son. Both Henry and Alice are given as 48, he is an Accountant, and they were living at 40, Streatham Common (N). | LING, Henry Albert Phillip (I670)
|
| 973 | There is no obvious later data for this person. The possibilities are very similar to those of John his cousin born 1758 | JACKMAN, John (I738)
|
| 974 | There is no obvious later record of John. There are possible censuses in 1841, 51, 61 in Newington, but the data is conflicting. | DAVENPORT, John (I559)
|
| 975 | There is no obvious marriage record on the internet. Possibilities are John HOWARD and Joan ISAAC, North Tawton, 1740, John HERD (from Bow) and Joan BATTISHILL, Colebrook 1728. Searching for children born to John and Joan identifies nobody baptised between 1726 and 1743, and potentially people born as late as 1764, though maybe Mary 1757 is the latest. However looking at the children it definitely supports the N Tawton wedding. Conversely N Tawton is a distance from Crediton where all the children are born. On balance, the N Tawton marriage is preferred. Separately, the 3 children born 1759, 1761 and 1764, all baptised in 1776 are included. This is on the basis that the earliest possible deaths for John and Joan are later (John 1781 or later, Joan 1792 or later) | Family: John HEARD / Joan ????? (F283)
|
| 976 | There is no obvious surname for Bessie. The best match on Birth indices is Bessie BOWDEN born Q3 1854 Okehampton. But there is no Bessie who appears to marry a POTTER in the period 1881-5, (noting that the 1911 Census says they had been married 30 years, and noting that there eldest child in 1891 is 5, and in 1911 they declare 2 children, both alive), and no Bessie (or variant who marries John POTTER at any time). Maybe COOMBE based on the 1901 Census? There is a Elizabeth DUCKETT who marries a John Potter Q3, 1882 at St Thomas, Exeter. She appears in 1861, but gives her birthplace as Barnstable, so this seems unlikely. | ????, Bessie (I649)
|
| 977 | There is no obvious William Ellis. Looking at possible baptisms in a 10 mile radius amongst internet records, the most likely would seem to be a baptism on 27/5/1722 in Herringfleet, son of William (no mother recorded). But whilst it is the most likely, there is still significant uncertainty. There are earlier baptisms, which would make William quite old at his marriage, though there is another marriage in 1750 with William Ellis, a widower, so this might be one of the earlier baptisms. | ELLIS, William (I954)
|
| 978 | There is no record I can find of her birth or baptism. Her home in 1901 may be The Mount Board School. Certainly the images I can find for the "the Mount" are very impressive! In 1911 she says 2, The Mount, presumably meaning something like Flat 2 in the Mount. There is nothing obvious in terms of death. Certainly having spent her life in Sampford Courtenay there is nothing in the registers, though some other possibilities in Devon. The best option seems to be Q2 1917 Okehampton vol 5b, p491, aged 76 (should be 79, maybe 78) | HATHERLEY, Suzanna (I612)
|
| 979 | There is no reliable data on where and when John was born. The most likely would seem to be he was born to Will in Harpenden, christened 29/3/1702, as this is as close to Willian, where he married, as any other baptism. | HUNT, John (I457)
|
| 980 | There is no very clear data following his baptism, but the 1851 Census that indicates somebody from Bow is very likely. This then implies a marriage to Selina (GLASS), which is 25/12/1845 in Wellington, and therefore the 1881 and 1891 Censuses, which give his place of birth as Somerset. Slocombe is a common Somerset name, so there may be errors in this logic, but it does seem to be very likely correct. There is less confidence in the 1841 Census. | SLOCOMBE, Samuel (I637)
|
| 981 | There is no very clear story about what happens after 1911. He is not obviously in the death indices, or in the emigration ones. There are possible incidents in WW1, but this seems unlikely given his age. He might be in a boarding house (the Lyceym Hotel) in Lambeth, with occupation given as "Stoker". Place of birth given as Lambeth, which is suitably vague, albeit correct. | IMPEY, John (I426)
|
| 982 | There is no very convincing evidence for James Brown elsewhere. He was present at his son's marriage in 1898. There is no James Brown living at the same address as Jane Maria Brown, so we assume that she had died by 1901, and if so there are possible James Browns in London in 1901, of which the best is as brother of Sarah HARTWRIGHT, but unfortunately not listed as widowed, rather divorced. A "Machine Ruler" is essentially a machine operator, but no particular industry involved | BROWN, James (I103)
|
| 983 | There is no very obvious evidence of a marriage between Francis and Ann. IGI identifies 2 other probable children in Hertfordshire - Eliseph (b1752), who probably died 1752 and Mary (b1744). Mary is also mentioned in the parish register, but there is no mother - nor are any of the children's mothers mentioned. So it is likely on that basis that they were married 1735-1745, but there are no obviously suitable internet records anywhere in the country. The key problem is that the parish registers for Great Gaddesden from 1711 to 1741 are missing. This means that if, as would be most probable, that both Francis and Ann are from Great Gaddesden, we are unlikely to ever know their births or even marriage. The nearby parishes of Little Gaddesden, Harpenden etc have possible names, but there is no obvious reason to pick any of these. So the story finishes with some speculation and comments..... There is a marriage with Ann CLARK in Watford 20/4/1729, but this seems too early. However internet trees have children born to this marriage in the 1730s....I think this is not correct, as there are the following children baptised to Francis and Anne at the parish church in Watford:- Thomas (1731) Francis (1732/3) Anne (1736) Mary (1739) Francis (1754) (There is also an unnamed, and so presumably young child of Francis Freeman buried on 31st Feb(?) 1730/1) The gap between Mary and Francis is tempting to think the family married in Watford, moved 12 miles to Great Gaddesden and then moved back to Watford, but the baptism of Francis in 1754 while Francis (b1749) is still alive makes this seem more unlikely than not. In addition, there is a marriage between Francis Freeman and Ruth IVORY on 6/12/1753 at Great Gaddesden. A number of children are recorded as born to these :- James (1757) Fanney (1759) Jenny (1762) John (1764) There is also Thos, in 1755, but the parents given as Frances and Eliz. There is no evidence for a death of Ann Freeman up to and including the marriage of 6/12/1753 at Great Gaddesden. There is a burial of Ann FREE on 12 Aug 1749. It is possible that there was a communication problem and if so that would fit a reasonable story.... | Family: Francis FREEMAN / Ann ???? (F142)
|
| 984 | There is no very obvious information after her baptism. There is a Joane Jackman "of Spreyton" buried S Tawton 4/12/1741, but whilst Spreyton is not far away, the youngest brother, Alexander, was baptised at S Tawton in April 1739. There is a Joan Jackman buried S Tawton 30/12/1770 which is possible. There is a Joan Jackman who married John SAMPSON 5/11/1787 (ie aged 42), witnessed by Thomas Jackman, ie possibly her brother. This seems equally possible. | JACKMAN, Joane (I746)
|
| 985 | There is no very obvious later records for William, but the name is a very common one, and there are both possible deaths before 1851 and possible 1851 and 1861 census records. | HALL, William (I508)
|
| 986 | There is no very obvious records after 1851. My presumption is that he died between 1851 and 1861, and although there is nothing in Crediton, he may have gone to London. There is a Samuel Howe marrying a Mary Ann GRAHAM in Bath, but I think this is a different Samuel, son of John and Emma... | HOWE, Samuel (I901)
|
| 987 | There is nothing to identify what happens after baptism... There is a marriage to George WANNACOTE in Sept 1749 (see also Marian Jackman bapt 1692) - which would be possible if this Marian were baptised as a child, but there is nothing to indicate that. There are no obvious other marriages or deaths within 20 miles of South Tawton, though there are instances of Mary Jackman being buried, so it could be one of these, but there are Mary Jackmans in this family in South Tawton who also occupy these records!!! | JACKMAN, Marian (I728)
|
| 988 | There is reference to a bankruptcy against a business partner of James, William Henry FRENCH. I cannot be sure that it is this James Disborough but the address suggests that it is. It would seem that the partners, described as "Provision Brokers and Dealers" in Little Eastcheap, became bankrupt on 11/9/1816, with the final determination being made on 3/2/1824. My knowledge of what happens is poor, but I sense that James and Henry parted ways following the bankruptcy notice; maybe this allowed James to marry in 1817? | DISBOROUGH, James (I229)
|
| 989 | There is very little about Mary that I can find, but the marriage looks right. Both Peter and Mary are recorded as widowed, and so Mary's surname at the time (CROW) is not her birth name. But I can find no suitable burial for Mary Juniper. So the story is definitely incomplete. Conversely, the document "Some Rough Materials for a History of the Hundred of North Erpingham, Vol. 1, 1883 - Compilation of Published Sources" says her name is Sarah. This says burial 27 Sep 1813, aged 54 at death, but the handwritten burial register which is slightly different, is assumed to be correct. However, there is no record of Sarah marrying a CROW that really matches any other data. So we assume her name is Mary, but for whatever reason she is Sarah after marrying Peter. Perhaps this is related to the daughter who died not long before the wedding? To understand Mary's past, I have looked at possible men surnamed CROW (or CROWE) who were buried in the 20 years leading up to her wedding with Peter, and within 5 miles of Mundesley. Only John CROW is a possibility. I cannot find the original document but the transcripts have him being buried either 1/12/1797 or 1/12/1798. Hopefully it is the first of these to allow the banns to be read for the marriage to Peter. I then looked at marriages between a male CROW/CROWE and Mary or Sarah, within 10 miles of Mundesley. There is a Charles CROW marrying Mary STEWARD on 26/8/1782 at North Walsham. However Charles does not appear to have died before 1798. So I think the most likely scenario is John CROW marrying Mary PALGRAVE 12/4/1771 at North Walsham. The issue with the suggested marriage is that, Mary would be 13 at her marriage. However, I think it more likely that she was unsure about her age than one of the other possibilities above. There are lots of possible baptisms for John Crow; maybe the most probable is a baptism in 1744 at North Walsham. There is nothing obvious for Mary Palgrave (or indeed Mary Steward), but a number of possiblities at 20 miles distant. The only other option is with records not yet available on the Internet. So this is still a best guess!!!! | PALGRAVE, Mary (I946)
|
| 990 | There is very little obvious about Richard's origins. The transcript of the baptism only mentions his mother Jane, who was presumably unmarried. See also some notes on Jane (some of which are identical to those here) Whilst Jane is assumed to be KNOWLES, it is noted that there are no obvious baptisms for a 20 year period either side of 1757 for a KNOWLES with a mother called Jane. So it is possible that Richard's mother just invented a surname. In that case Richard may have grown up with any surname. possible death 1809 based on IGI information There is a Richard KNOWLES who was buried at Cruwys Morchard 18/3/1796. But this is 13-14 miles away from Bow. The significance is that it appears to be the only person of this name, or something similar with practical burial details. However there are clearly a number of KNOWLES and KNOWLS baptised and buried here, so it is also quite unlikely to be our Richard. | KNOWLES, Richard (I677)
|
| 991 | There may be some inaccuracies and there is a risk that I am picking up 2 different people, one born in Cripplegate (see for instance 1901, 1911 and 1921 Census), and one born in Gravesend (see for instance 1891 Census). But there are other consistent facts, eg the Juniper connection (dont actually know yet who is George W JUNIPER in the 1901 Census, but it would be entirely reasonable for him to lodge with a family member, who might be a cousin of Elizabeth for instance). More work on this is needed. See also the notes about the separation or not with his wife in the notes for Elizabeth | LITTLEMORE, James William (I1004)
|
| 992 | There were 2 Poor Houses in Portsmouth at the time, but it is assumed to be the one in Elm Lane, Portsea, given the burial location. | HILLBECK, Edward (I1131)
|
| 993 | There were 2 properties with rent (presumably not owned) in Lower Precinct, St Leonards, Cheapside with a James DISBOROUGH - this may be him and his father or both him(?). This applies from 1808 to 1813, at which point Frances takes over, hence the assumed death date. There is also rent in Lower Precint, St Leonards in 1798. There is a James DISBOROUGH, perfumer, at 7, Fish St. Hill in the Holden Directory of 1799 and 1802, but nothing for the 1805 and 1809 editions for James DISBOROUGH or DESBOROUGH, or similar names. Ancestry has trees with his parents as William and Frances, but ith no independent evidence for this. Index to death duties for Apr 1813 mentions Frances DISBOROUGH, 7, Fish St. Hill | DISBOROUGH, James (I239)
|
| 994 | They had 6 children, based on 1911 Census, all listed at 1901 viz:- Clara, 16 Charlotte, 15 Ellen, 13 Florence, 8 Jane, 5 William, 2 | Family: William James WEBB / Jane MARSHALL (F177)
|
| 995 | This comes next to the entry for the Rectory, so presumably was the house nearest to it. | Source (S478)
|
| 996 | This deduced on the basis that it seems most likely marriage to Sophia - in which case it is Apr qtr 1852, Bury St Edmonds | Family: John JARRELL / Sophia MOTHERSOLE (F235)
|
| 997 | This information has been largely deduced from Ann's second marriage - which is highly likely to be correct given the fathers details. The only thing that does not really match is John Hover b 1836 who is therefore presumably Susan Amelia's twin but has not been found yet in the Bertand details.... Ann married John R HOVER (1809-1868) on 4/10/1836 in Islington. Birth/baptism details fit in part and are best available info on the internet but suggests that Ann's father moved very quickly from labourer here to victualler at her 2nd wedding..... | ELDRIDGE, Ann (I91)
|
| 998 | This is clearly a local name, but there is no sensible record on the internet that matches this. | SCKOYLS, Jane (I975)
|
| 999 | This is clearly the right baptism details, and so it is surprising that at the Census she was said to be not born in county. However William who was born in county according to the Census is not obvious in Herts parish records, so perhaps he was not..... She almost certainly marries, but there is no clear basis for any particular marriage, though internet trees favour Thomas DEAN (Q4, 1844). | FREEMAN, Sarah (I195)
|
| 1000 | This marriage has been picked as most sensible based on ages etc. There is an Agnes BATTIISHILL, his cousin who could be his wife, but the age difference is greater, and marrying cousins was of course frowned on (or worse), so the Agnes picked here seems more likely. There is also a marriage in South Tawton between John Jackman and Susannah TRIMLETT in 1737, which is taken to be that of John Jackman, his nephew, b1716. Allocating children is more complicated since the vicar did not put down the names of the mother - but it is assumed that the earlier children are those of this John. Certainly there is a Susanna Jackman in 1743 which is most likely to the nephew. Similarly there is a John in 1745, but there is no evidence that John, the son of this John, b1731, had died, so the later John is assumed to be linked to John and Susannah. There is a lot of suggestion on the internet trees that this John married again (though clearly a marriage to Anne Splatt is wrong), but again this is not supported by the available evidence of the only sensible Agnes dieing in 1774. Lastly there is a marriage in Spreyton with a John Jackman to Mary MIDDLETON on 21/4/1755, but that is for people living in that parish, and although close, is assumed to be a different John. | JACKMAN, John (I744)
|